The British love their chips (sorry, crisps)!

Thin, brittle, salty slices of fried potato that are sold in sealed packages are called chips in North America, Australia, Singapore, Jamaica, South Africa and pretty much everywhere else. In the UK and Ireland they’re called crisps.

Here’s an ad for Walkers crips: #crispin or #crispout. In the UK, it’s pretty common to put crisps in a sandwich. A “crisp sandwich” (or “crisp butty” in some regions) is a simple but beloved snack. It usually consists of two slices of bread, butter, and a generous layer of crisps for added crunch. Some people add other fillings like cheese, ham, or even salad. Below a more elaborate version of this popular combo. Healthy? No. Tasty? Maybe!

Advert for Walkers crisps. Food (Waitrose) magazine. July 2021.

A year (or two, or five) of deconsumption – a personal story

Deconsumption is a relatively new trend sweeping through the consumerist world, but it is as old as time. For those who did not grow up in a capitalist, consumption-driven society, it is simply a regular way of life.

So what is deconsumption? Here is a detailed scientific definition: “Deconsumption is manifested as voluntary abandonment of behaviours aimed at satisfying the desires created by marketers in favour of conscious, rational and ethical choices to meet one’s needs. This consumer trend essentially involves voluntary discontinuation of egocentric consumption behaviour that may result both from the motivation of an egocentric individual focused on the good and from concern for the welfare of social groups, future generations and the natural environment, or may ensue from purely altruistic motivation.


We don’t need five pairs of jeans, ten dresses, or five pairs of shoes, and we don’t need to buy books. My sins are simple: I promise not to buy anything then I walk into a shop, see a top I like and I buy it. The same applies to books as I love traditional book shops and I always hope I will curve out more time for reading than is possible. Almost a year ago, I started a deconsumption trial with a promise not to buy any new clothes, shoes, or books for a year. I almost succeeded. My intentions are much more selfish than being altruistic or caring about the natural environment, I just want to save money!

I decided to continue for another year. One year was not enough to use up my stored goods — tonnes of t-shirts, blouses, jackets, and shoes. I feel like it will take me another two to three years to wear down most of my clothing that hasn’t even been touched in the past year. I simply have too much.


The same applies to the books I’ve been purchasing with the intention of reading them “later.” Of course, that “later” has never come, so now I have piles of books gathering dust, unlikely to be read anytime soon.

So, here’s another promise to myself: one more year of no purchases of clothing, shoes, or books. I’ll check back in September 2025.

Wish me luck!

#deconsumption

Best Global Brands 2023 – What makes McDonald’s still so successful?

Interbrand has published its 2023 Global Brand ranking. As expected, Interbrand’s 2023 Best Global Brands ranking lists Apple as the most valuable brand at $502.68 billion, followed by Microsoft at $316.66 billion and Amazon at $276.93 billion.

McDonald’s ranked number 11 following 5 point increase. Established in 1995 in Des Plaines, Illinois, USA, the brand is present in 118 countries.

What makes McDonald’s so successful? Several key factors contribute to the international success of the brand:

  1. Consistency and Standardization: McDonald’s offers a consistent menu and quality worldwide, ensuring customers know what to expect regardless of location.
  2. Brand Recognition: The golden arches and Ronald McDonald are universally recognized symbols, contributing to strong brand recognition and trust.
  3. Adaptation to Local Tastes: McDonald’s adapts its menu to cater to local tastes and cultural preferences, which helps it appeal to a broader audience. McFalafel in Egypt, Teriyaki McBurger with pork in Japan!
  4. Operational Efficiency: Their highly efficient supply chain and franchising model reduce costs and improve service speed and quality.
  5. Marketing and Innovation: Effective marketing strategies and constant menu innovations keep the brand relevant and appealing.

When have You visited McDonald’s last?

Marketing in multicultural marketplaces

Multicultural marketing is marketing to consumers and/or markets who are, in some way, multicultural. This type of marketing includes ethnic marketing, cross-cultural marketing, monocultural and omnicultural marketing. For example, an online fashion retailer selling fashion to consumers in the UK and Germany is going to do some type of multicultural marketing.

Below are some examples of marketing in multicultural marketplaces.

Image 1 and Image 2: Metropolitan online advertisements representing cultural targeting based on ethnicity.

Image 1: London Metropolitan Police online advert (2023) targeting people from a range of ethnic groups.
Image 2: London Metropolitan Police online advertisement targeting people based on their ethnicity.
Post office leaflet – Luton (UK) branch.

Cultural targeting in a multicultural market – Luton (UK) branch of Primark.

OmanAir in-flight magazine advertisement: cultural fit in marketing. The model fits the culture of the target market.

What is culture and does it matter?

Have you ever wondered why people who move to other countries still eat the same foods as in their home countries,  and celebrate their national holidays? Or why Egyptians build their homes differently from the Germans? Or why Tokyo is super clean but London isn’t?

It is because of culture. Culture is the way do things, the way we solve problems, the way we relate to other people and the way we relate to nature and the world around us. Culture is the way we dress, what we eat, the beliefs we hold. Culture is the language we speak, the movies we watch and the books we read.

In the broadest sense of the word, culture is everything that surrounds us (material culture), and the invisible internal drivers of human behaviour (immaterial culture) such as beliefs or opinions.

As early as 1871, Tylor defined culture as  “that complex whole which includes knowledge, belief, art, morals, law, custom, and any other capabilities and habits acquired by man as  society.” (cited in White, 1959).

In the English language alone, there are over 160 definitions of the concept. For example, the Cambridge online dictionary defines culture in the following way: “the way of lifeespecially the general customs and beliefs, of a particular group of people at a particular time; […] the attitudesbehaviouropinions, etc. of a particular group of people within society.”

Other descriptions include: “culture consist of n social signals correlated with m different responses” (White, 1959).

But one of my favourite descriptions of culture is one given by a famous culture researcher, Geert Hofstede: Culture is “the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the members of one group or category of people from another.” (Hofstede, 1991)

The differences between cultures are like difference between two (or more) computer operating systems. Have you ever tried to transition from PC to Macintosh? On the surface, the two operating systems are virtually the same, and yet people struggle to switch from one to the other. It is very similar with culture – we find it easier to operate in a system (language, clothing, food, values, religious beliefs) already familiar to us.

How do you know how different any two or more cultures are? There are many indices that classify cultures on selected characteristics. Foe example, the very well-known Hosftede’s framework of cultural dimensions allows to compare cultures on those specific cultural dimensions. There is GLOBE, and a more recent ‘Three cultures World’ approach that groups cultures into similar and dissimilar cultures. Another approach is the Country Similarity Index that “attempts to quantify how similar countries are to each other relative to other countries. The index is a statistically-based way to measure this. It weighs equally five major aspects of countries: their demographics, culture, politics, infrastructure, and geography”.

Ok, yes, we all have culture, but does is matter?

As human beings, in the biological sense, we are all the same, we share the same human characteristics.  But at a cultural level, we do differ in the way we live our lives and solve the universal problems. Culture is so strongly embedded in who we are, it is like breathing, we only realise we have our own culture when we are faced with another way of life (for example, when we move abroad and experience culture shock). There is plenty of evidence to show that culture does matter, and that it influences our behaviour (for example: https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/9145w ) . For example, if religion is part of our culture, it influences the type of religious holidays we celebrate.

Have you ever been to Japan? Have you noticed how clean it is, for example in Tokyo? Have you ever visited London in the UK? It looks nothing like Tokyo, and is not very clean either. What makes Tokyo so clean and London so dirty? Yes, I would say it is ‘culture’. Because culture is the way we treat our external environment, and how we interact with other people.

Can we change culture?

Yes, and no. Culture is passed down over generations through six channels: families, schools, the media, religious institutions, leadership, and the law. Culture is also shaped by climate and natural environment because it affects how we live (for example, how we build houses to protect ourselves from the cold). History also influences culture. Cultural change is possible and there are a range of approaches that can be used to change culture. However, it is a very slow and difficult process. This is why immigrants who move to other cultures find it so difficult to shed their own cultures, especially when host and home cultures are very different (low cultural fit).

Sources:

Cambridge Online Dictionary: https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/culture  

Czarnecka, B., Baxter, K., Basil, D., Guzman, F., & O’Neail, C. (2022). The effectiveness of gendered wording in health promotion leaflet – exploratory experiment in four English-speaking countries: the UK, USA, Ireland and Canada.  Available from here: https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/9145w

Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

White, L. A. (1959). The concept of culture. American anthropologist, 61(2), 227-251.

What is the best country to pursue a PhD?

Very often I participate in formal and informal discussions about the quality of doctoral training (in social sciences) in different countries. Many prospective applicants ask where they should pursue doctoral training and which system guarantees the most rigorous scientific research training.

Here is my take on the subject based on my own personal experiences (as a PhD student in the UK), and as a Director of Postgraduate Research Students (also in the UK).

I chose three countries and compared the PhD programs based on a number of factors. Why these three countries? UK and USA because these two countries are often perceived as competitors, I am familiar with UK system, and Poland because of the recent changes to doctoral training.

I chose the best university in each country: University of Warsaw in Poland, University of Oxford in the UK, and Harvard University in the USA. The below comparison is based on the information about PhD programs available on the websites of those universities, and on some of my personal experiences with PhD programs (UK). I am also comparing the quality of PhD programs in social sciences only.

FactorUSAUKPoland
How long does it take?5 -6 years3 years4 years
Compulsory training/modules in research methods ?yesnoYes
Compulsory foreign language trainingNoNoYes
Core subject exam/s?YesNoYes
PhD scholarshipYesOnly for selected candidates, otherwise self-fundedYes

Phd in United Kingdom

PhD programs in the UK officially last 3 years (full-time). There is also an option to study part-time. There is no compulsory taught element – this means doctoral students do not need to attend any classes and submit any coursework or pass exams. Many universities offer optional training but no-one will force you to attend it. the UK also offers general researcher training but it focuses on only very general skills such as literature review, presentation skills and conference presentations.

PhD in the United States

The United States of America is one of the most popular study destinations for doctoral (PhD) studies among international students in social sciences. PhD programs in the USA last 5 years and can only be taken full-time. Students need to attend classes, submit coursework and pass exams.

PhD in Poland

Doctoral students in Poland can study full-time or part-time in Doctoral Schools (Szkoły Doktorskie). Students have to attend compulsory classes and pass exams in selected subjects specific to their area of study. Students also must attend and pass exams (or submit coursework) in research methods.

The verdict

If you want to become a very well-rounded scientist and a specialist in your field, head to the USA, or Poland (if you speak the language or if the university offers English-language option).

If you want to focus only on your very narrow topic- head to the UK.

How NOT to promote vaccines to Covid-19 vaccine-hesitant Poles in Britain

I am a Pole in Britain and I live in Luton, one of the most deprived areas in the UK. My neighbours are diverse and also include Poles who resist vaccinations. This is weird in itself and probably would make a very interesting study because all my friends and family in Poland are getting vaccinated like crazy (mostly working-class so very similar demographics to the majority of Polish people living in Luton).

But here in the UK, things are a little bit different, especially when it comes to Poles in Luton. Vaccine take-up amongst this group is low. I do not have any official numbers to prove it so please take this post with a healthy dose of skepticism, it is just what I hear and see on social media forums, and when I talk to my Polish friends, and hairdresser, builder, cleaner. A few weeks ago, I was targeted by an online advert on Facebook – an ad targeted specifically at Poles, available on the London Borough of Hounslow Facebook profile. Ad can be found here in the Facebook Ad Library.

You can watch it here: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?id=461639755159948

and a screenshot of it the ad below:

The advert is an official NHS advert providing information about the Covid-19 vaccination in the Polish language.

So how do you NOT advertise vaccines to skeptical, vaccine-hesitant Poles in the UK?

Here are my pointers:

  1. Do not make it look like the endorser is reading from a dictated script and runs out of breath
  2. Do not make it that long (but if you solve point 1 above, the length should not be such a big issue)
  3. Do not make it look forced and ‘fake’, the endorser looks like she is struggling to read out the script.
  4. Do not use an endorser who looks insecure and a bit timid.

Other than that, they did pretty well. Targeted ads, the endorser is an assistant nurse, a Pole, and the advert is in the target group’s language.

More could have been done to make the ad look more realistic and ‘relaxed’, less script reading and more of a casual conversation would work better. But time was probably an issue here, so all in all – not the worst result.